Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 20190416061900.GI2673@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker))
Responses Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's
> the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place).

After thinking some more on it, this behavior looks rather sensible to
me.  Are there any objections?

> However, the doc patch lost the trailing paren:

Fixed on my branch, thanks.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Accidental setting of XLogReaderState.private_data ?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby withminRecoveryPoint