Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
Date
Msg-id 20190402171721.GA23559@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2019-Apr-02, Tom Lane wrote:

> FWIW, I see six potential candidates, not two:
> 
> pgsql/src/backend/commands/trigger.c: 3380:                 elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status: %u",
test);
> pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeLockRows.c: 232:                 elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status:
%u",
> pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c: 881:                             elog(ERROR, "unexpected
table_lock_tuplestatus: %u",
 
> pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c: 1384:                             elog(ERROR, "unexpected
table_lock_tuplestatus: %u",
 
> pgsql/src/backend/executor/execReplication.c: 211:                 elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status:
%u",res);
 
> pgsql/src/backend/executor/execReplication.c: 375:                 elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status:
%u",res);
 

The other four handle the TM_Invisible case with a different error
message.  Anyway, the six of them are unexpected so changing them all to
PANIC ought to be good enough.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed