Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
Date
Msg-id 20190313021906.GQ13812@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 07:01:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think this is even close to popular enough to incur the
> maybe of a separate function / more complicated interface. By this
> logic we can change basically no APIs anymore.

Well, if folks here think that it is not worth worrying about, I won't
cry on that either.  If only the original API is kept, could it just
be possible to make it extensible with some bits16 flags then?  Adding
only a boolean is not really appealing.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add support for hyperbolic functions, as well as log10().