Re: Documentation and code don't agree about partitioned tableUPDATEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Documentation and code don't agree about partitioned tableUPDATEs
Date
Msg-id 20190209110147.wpbkglvdqr72fksj@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Documentation and code don't agree about partitioned table UPDATEs  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-02-07 09:16:09 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 4:57 PM David Rowley
> <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 16:20, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I agree that the docs need to be updated and this patch should be
> > > backpatched as well.  However, I think the older wording was more
> > > descriptive and clear, so I have modified your patch a bit to retain
> > > part of old wording, see the result as attached.
> >
> > I have to admit, I was quite fond of the original text, at least when
> > it was true.  Your alteration of it seems pretty good to me too.
> >
> 
> Thanks, pushed!

Thanks David and Amit!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: XLogInsert() of dangling pointer while logging replica identity