Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD
Date
Msg-id 20190116020748.5lpniu26eercs3t4@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-01-16 11:02:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> f3db7f16 has proved that it can be a bad idea to run pg_resetwal on a
> data folder which does not match the version it has been compiled
> with.
> 
> As of HEAD, PG_CONTROL_VERSION is still 1100:
> $ pg_controldata | grep "pg_control version"
> pg_control version number:            1100
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to bump it up to 1200?

We don't commonly bump that without corresponding control version
changes. I don't see what we'd gain by the bump?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead followslog_file_mode permissions