On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:11:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> In PG v10 and up this link goes to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159.
> Evidently whoever updated it didn't bother to back-patch into old
> branches.
I don't think that really cool to have user-facing documentation which
goes to the void on supported branches, especially if there is an
adequate replacement. Tom, do you think that this is worth updating?
--
Michael