On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 04:50:11PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay, that makes sense, now I got your point. Perhaps somebody else
> has an opinion to offer or has an objection with the proposed change?
And committed this one, after playing more with the instrumentation
callbacks and checking that the change was consistent for functions,
triggers and event triggers.
Attached is the set of tests I used which has some regression tests.
The results won't fail with HEAD at 4203842a, and will generate some
diffs after e0ef136d as Pavel's patch has changed the generated
output.
--
Michael
