Re: RHEL 8.0 build - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: RHEL 8.0 build
Date
Msg-id 20181125215109.2gvd2qdkugvi74sv@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RHEL 8.0 build  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Python versions (was Re: RHEL 8.0 build)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-11-24 15:49:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> writes:
> >  Trying to set up a buildfarm animal on a RHEL 8.0 (beta) system,
> > the build fails early:
> > ...
> > It appears to be a "configure" script looking for python; and there is
> > no such.  You can have python3 or python2 - but neither package install
> > provides a symlink of just "python".
> 
> Yeah, some distros are starting to act that way, and I suspect it's
> causing pain for a lot of people.
> 
> Currently we are agnostic about which python version to use, so if you
> don't have anything simply named "python", you have to tell configure
> what to use by setting the PYTHON environment variable.
> 
> In a buildfarm configuration file this would look something like
> 
>         # env settings to pass to configure. These settings will only be seen by
>         # configure.
>         config_env => {
> +           PYTHON => "/usr/local/bin/python3",
> 
> There's been some preliminary discussion about starting to default to
> python3, but given this project's inherent conservatism, I don't expect
> that to happen for some years yet.  In any case, whenever we do pull
> that trigger we'd surely do so only in HEAD not released branches, so
> buildfarm owners will need to deal with the case for years more.

Why don't we probe for python2 in addition to python by default? That
ought to make RHEL 8 work, without making the switch just yet.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API