Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Date
Msg-id 20181025150849.j4py2nkqjx3cgw26@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Oct-25, Chapman Flack wrote:

> On 10/25/18 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think getting out from under libxml2's idiosyncrasies and security
> > lapses would be great, but is there a plausible alternative out there?
> 
> Depends on whether anything in [1] sounds plausible.
> 
> [1]:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_vs_SQL/XML_Standards#Possible_ways_forward

Heh, I didn't notice this part of the document.  Integrating a C runtime
of a Java library sounds nightmarish -- I wouldn't even think about
that.

XQilla seems to depend on Xerces, and seems to have died in 2011.

Zorba appears to have been taken propietary, from the looks of its last
commits.

Maybe the best way forward is to implement all the JSON functionality
and remove the SQL/XML bits.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards