On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:31:19PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-10-09 21:26:31 +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > In-Reply-To: <20180928223240.kgwc4czzzekrpsid@alap3.anarazel.de>
> > > As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject. I plan
> > > to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish. I thought it'd be better
> > > to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> > > chance to object.
> >
> > How much time would someone have to convert the timetravel piece of
> > contrib/spi to use non-deprecated time types in order to make this
> > window?
>
> "this window"?
>
> It's not entirely trivial, but also not that hard. It'd break existing
> users however, as obviously their tables wouldn't dump / load or
> pg_upgrade into a working state.
>
> But I think spi/timetravel is not something people can actually use / do
> use much, the functionality is way too limited in practice, the
> datatypes have been arcane for about as long as postgres existed,
> etc. And the code isn't fit to serve as an example.
>
> In my opinion it has negative value at this point.
I suppose the proposals to add the standard-conformant temporal stuff
would make this moot, but I don't recall a complete patch for that.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
