On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2018, at 01:19, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Looking at the refactoring patch 0001, wouldn't signalfuncs.c make a
>> better name for the new file? There are already multiple examples of
>> this type, like logicalfuncs.c, slotfuncs.c, etc.
>
> I have no strong feelings on this, I was merely using the name that Alvaro
> suggested when he brought up the refactoring as an extension of this patch.
> signalfuncs.c is fine by me, so I did this rename in the attached revision.
Indeed, I missed the previous part posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180124154548.gmpyvkzlsijren7u@alvherre.pgsql
Alvaro, do you have a strong preference over one or the other?
--
Michael
