Re: Collation versioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: Collation versioning
Date
Msg-id 20180912081547.GA24584@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Collation versioning  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Collation versioning  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 <CAEepm=1xGTsLDx63UEdcJ8MdG63CNJ-tsDWHbH9djtvxRH5ZWw@mail.gmail.com>
> 2.  We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a
> collation OID.  I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for
> starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to
> rows in a non-shared catalog.

Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after
all.

Christoph


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment