Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData
Date
Msg-id 20180910.192415.2069028556845661211.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>> 
>>>> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
>>>> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
>>>> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
>>>
>>> I agree. Change made.
>> 
>> Patch applies cleanly. Doc build ok.
>> 
>> One part talks about "terminating line", the other of "termination
>> line". I wonder whether one is better than the other?
> 
> I am not a native English speaker so I maybe wrong... for me, current
> usage of "terminating line", and "termination line" looks correct. The
> former refers to concrete example thus uses "the", while the latter
> refers to more general case thus uses "an".
> 
> BTW, I think the patch should apply to master and REL_11_STABLE
> branches at least. But should this be applied to other back branches
> as well?

I have marked this as "ready for committer".

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: Latest HEAD fails to build