Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData
Date
Msg-id 20180903.140257.1878564220587788778.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re[3]: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
> 
>>> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
>>> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
>>> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
>>
>> I agree. Change made.
> 
> Patch applies cleanly. Doc build ok.
> 
> One part talks about "terminating line", the other of "termination
> line". I wonder whether one is better than the other?

I am not a native English speaker so I maybe wrong... for me, current
usage of "terminating line", and "termination line" looks correct. The
former refers to concrete example thus uses "the", while the latter
refers to more general case thus uses "an".

BTW, I think the patch should apply to master and REL_11_STABLE
branches at least. But should this be applied to other back branches
as well?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rafia Sabih
Date:
Subject: Re: Hint to set owner for tablespace directory
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions