Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date
Msg-id 20180802163504.kjcp7qjiuwupndsp@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-08-02 10:54:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, "near future" means "before Monday".  I don't want to ship beta3
> with this in place if we end up reverting later, because it'd mean
> thrashing packagers' file manifests, which they won't appreciate.
> It might be best to revert in v11 for now, and then we can put it back
> after beta3 if there's agreement that the questions are satisfactorily
> resolved.

+1


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Fallout from PQhost() semantics changes
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster