On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:58:42AM -0400, Jeff Janes wrote:
> But it was really waiting for the syncs of the new -D dir to finish. The
> attached patch adds a -v notice that it is starting to do the sync, with
> the wording taken from initdb's equivalent message.
This is a good idea. Would we want that back-patched? I am sure that
nobody is going to complain for an extra informational log.
--
Michael
