Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
Date
Msg-id 20180725155137.xiktdutggtoh5sph@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-07-25 11:45:58 -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 07/25/2018 11:25 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> 
> > I don't understand why it's not obvious that one can unknowingly and
> > accidentally re-invent someone else's idea.
> 
> It's perfectly obvious. It's the chief reason the whole topic
> of software patents has been deeply controversial for so long.
> 
> You seem to be using it as part of a proof by contradiction:
> 
> 
>   One can unknowingly and accidentally reinvent
>   a patented idea.
> 
>   If that were not tidily excused in practice,
>   software patents would be deeply problematic.
>   ----------------------------------------------
> 
>   Therefore, it must be the case that unknowing and
>   accidental reinvention is tidily excused in practice.

This seems like a discussion more suited to be over a beer, or some
other medium, not the PG lists.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs