Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Arthur Zakirov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date
Msg-id 20180723141254.GA10168@zakirov.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:30:43PM +0300, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> I looked for some tradeoffs of the patch. I think it could be parsing
> strings like the following input strings:
> 
> SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2011年5月1日', 'yyyy-MM-DD');
> SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2011y5m1d', 'yyyy-MM-DD');
> 
> HEAD extracts year, month and day from the string. But patched
> to_timestamp() raises an error. Someone could rely on such behaviour.
> The patch divides separator characters from letters and digits. And
> '年' or 'y' are letters here. And so the format string doesn't match the
> input string.

Sorry, I forgot to mention that the patch can handle this by using
different format string. You can execute:

=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2011年5月1日', 'yyyy年MM月DD日');
      to_timestamp      
------------------------
 2011-05-01 00:00:00+04

=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2011y5m1d', 'yyyy"y"MM"m"DD"d"');
      to_timestamp      
------------------------
 2011-05-01 00:00:00+04

or:

=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2011y5m1d', 'yyyytMMtDDt');
      to_timestamp      
------------------------
 2011-05-01 00:00:00+04

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?