Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature
Date
Msg-id 20180718202632.i6lsh3dlzj6ygury@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Jul-18, David G. Johnston wrote:

> ​-1 for printing a boolean t/f; would rather spell it out:
> 
> CASE WHEN "Key" THEN 'Key' ELSE 'Included' END AS "Data"

+1

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Make foo=null a warning by default.
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" testpending solution of its timing is (fwd)