Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nico Williams
Subject Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
Date
Msg-id 20180712031913.GF9712@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:10:33AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: Nico Williams [mailto:nico@cryptonector.com]
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:29:12AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > > How can one make defensive use of his patent if he allows everyone to
> > > use it royalty-free?  Can he use his patent for cross-licensing
> > > negotiation if some commercial database vendor accuses his company
> > > that PostgreSQL unintentionally infringes that vendor's patent?
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_termination
> 
> Thank you, his looks reasonable to give everyone the grant.  Then, I
> wonder if the community can accept patented code if the patent holder
> grants this kind of license.

I'm not a core member, but personally I'd be inclined to accept a
royalty-free, non-exclusive, non-expiring, transferrable, ..., grant
where the only condition is to not sue the patent holder.

I don't object to patents in general, but I think patent lifetimes are
way too long for software (because they are not commensurate with the
costs of developing software), and I understand that often one must
obtain patents for *defensive* purposes because there are sharks out
there.  So I'm inclined to accept patents with defensive but otherwise
very wide grants.

Nico
-- 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE tables referenced by FKs on partitioned tables
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.