Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: CTE optimization fence - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: CTE optimization fence
Date
Msg-id 20180628145446.3ichhyxb55kbr4x6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sv: Re: Sv: Re: CTE optimization fence  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2018-Jun-27, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:

> I know. I hate the INLINE proposal and hope default-behaviour will be like in 
> other DBs, inline like sub-query as default. GUC for preserving fence is what I 
> hope will happen.

I am probably biased ;-) but I like my proposal #1 in this email
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr%40alvherre.pgsql
where you have to mark queries were the current behavior is desired
(WITH MATERIALIZED), and leave all other queries alone.  I don't
remember any dissent on that.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Niles Oien
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl and plperlu language extentsions
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Database name with semicolon