Re: partition -> partitioned - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: partition -> partitioned
Date
Msg-id 20180620035900.qhpgo655oipymw2v@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partition -> partitioned  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Jun-20, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch.  Also,
> > made a minor update to a nearby comment.
> 
> That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
> Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
> I?  I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
> and "partition" have opposite meanings.

Hmm, will look.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README