Re: partition -> partitioned - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: partition -> partitioned
Date
Msg-id 20180620030347.GE20245@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partition -> partitioned  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: partition -> partitioned
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch.  Also,
> made a minor update to a nearby comment.

That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
I?  I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
and "partition" have opposite meanings.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons