Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check
Date
Msg-id 20180404194153.hangv6vcuwulyjrc@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-committers
On 2018-04-04 19:38:57 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check
> 
> This is a blind fix, since I don't have SE-Linux to verify it.
> 
> Per unwanted change in rhinoceros, running sepgsql tests.  Noted by Tom
> Lane.
> 
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32347.1522865050@sss.pgh.pa.us
> 
> Branch
> ------
> master

Shouldn't the difference due to the ONLY be visible in cases with
inheritance?  As in, spuriously succeeding or such?  Seems like
something that a normal regression test would be good for?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Restore erroneously removed ONLY from PK check