Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I think number of index tuples makes sense, as long as that's what the
> > costing needs. That is, it's up to the index AM to define it. But it
> > clearly should not flap like this ...
>
> > And it's not just BRIN. This is what I get with a GIN index:
>
> Sounds like the same kind of thing we just fixed for SP-GiST :-(
Most likely I modelled the BRIN code after GIN.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
