Hi,
On 2018-03-24 13:25:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (2) "abs", "boolean", "iterator", "other", "pointer", "reference",
> "string", and "type" all now are listed as typedef names.
>
> It's probably okay to treat "boolean" as a typedef, but all those others
> are complete disasters. Anyone know where they're coming from?
Semi informed theory: LLVM? I think I'd configured one of the LLVM
animals to collect typedefs, but that might have been a bad idea...
> As for "bool", we could probably deal with that most reliably by
> having pgindent add it as a special case. Maybe we could get it
> back in there by having some trailing-edge buildfarm member
> contribute typedefs, but that seems like a solution with a rather
> limited half-life.
Could we combine the list of typedefs with one manually maintained
in-tree?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
