Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Date
Msg-id 20180322014957.GF2490@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:42:35AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I'm super excited by the idea of multi-version support in TAP, if that's
> what you mean.
>
> Why? Because I use TAP heavily in extensions. Especially replication
> extensions. Which like to talk across multiple versions. I currently need
> external test frameworks and some hideous hacks to do this.

Okay, in front of such enthusiasm we could keep at least the refactoring
part of PostgresNode.pm :)
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values