Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
Date
Msg-id 20180314084621.GA617@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:30:59PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Doesn't it make sense if we provide a buildtime-script that
> collects the function names and builds a .h file containing a
> function using the list?
>
> The attached perl script is a rush work of such script, which
> works at the top of the source tree. It just prints the function
> definition, does not generate a .h file.
>
> I haven't confirmed anything about it but I had the following
> output from the current master.

I quite like that idea actually.  Please note that pl_handler.c declares
two more of them, so we may want a smarter parsing which takes into
account declarations of DefineCustom*Variable.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Incorrect comment for ExecProcessReturning
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for missing schema qualifications