Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id 20180313232603.rzvleymv4co5w5l6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
By the way, I checked whether patch 0002 (additional tests) had an
effect on coverage, and couldn't detect any changes in terms of
lines/functions.  Were you able to find any bugs in your code thanks to
the new tests that would not have been covered by existing tests?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: neqjoinsel versus "refresh materialized view concurrently"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: neqjoinsel versus "refresh materialized view concurrently"