Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/5/18 21:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > +my $kdc_port = int(rand() * 16384) + 49152;
> > That may not be worth worrying as that's an ephemeral port range but it
> > can make the test a bit unstable...
>
> This is what we've been using in the other tests as well. It's clearly
> not optimal, but making it more robust in a platform-agnostic way seems
> tricky.
We have port-testing code in PostgresNode.pm::get_new_node; maybe that
could be taking out of there into TestLib.pm?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
