Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > Um. Have you actually seen the "mail archive app" cut long threads off in > > other cases? Because it's certainly not supposed to do that... > > Hi Magnus, > > I mean the "flat" thread view: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAFjFpRfQ8GrQvzp3jA2wnLqrHmaXna-urjm_UY9BqXj=EaDTSA@mail.gmail.com > > The final message on that page is not the final message that appears > in my mail client for the thread. I guessed that might have been cut > off due to some hard-coded limit, but perhaps there is some other > reason (different heuristics for thread following?) You're thinking of message https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRfa6_n10cn3vXjN9hdTqneH6A1rfnLXy0PnCP63T2putw@mail.gmail.com but that is not the same thread -- it doesn't have the References or In-Reply-To headers (see "raw"; user/pwd is archives/antispam). Don't know why though -- maybe Gmail trimmed References because it no longer fit in the DKIM signature? Yours had a long one: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/raw/CAEepm%3D0VCrC-WfzZkq3YSvJXf225rDnp1ypjv%2BrjKO5d0%3DXqFg%40mail.gmail.com -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
