On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:54:22PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, this patch still wasn't quite right: although it fixed
>> one aspect of the behavior, it still produced identical results
>> for typemod NULL and typemod -1, which as the function's comment
>> explains is not what should happen. I tweaked the logic to look
>> as much as possible like before, and added a regression test.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks Tom. Yes, we focused on not changing any existing behavior with
this patch. So this report was a bug.
--
Michael
