Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Dianne Skoll
Subject Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
Date
Msg-id 20180228135220.1cd46347@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network  (Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com>)
Responses Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network  (Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com>)
Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network  (Dianne Skoll <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:49:33 -0500
Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com> wrote:

> Really? I think you really need to think about it.  You are dealing
> with a race condition.

Not at all, assuming rsync is being called by PostgreSQL's archive_command.

> You are dealing with a race condition involving filesystem metadata.

Nope.  Not true.  What are the things that are racing?

If you rsync data to make a base backup, then yes, use -c... but not because
of any race condition.  Instead, it's because of the coarse filesystem
timestamp granularity.

Regards,

Dianne.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Rui DeSousa
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
Next
From: Nagy László Zsolt
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network