Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section
Date
Msg-id 20180124003438.GC26207@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:36:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Can someone confirm this so I can apply this patch?

Never mind.  I see this was applied:

    doc: mention wal_receiver_status_interval as GUC affecting logical rep worker.
    
    wal_receiver_timeout, wal_receiver_status_interval and
    wal_retrieve_retry_interval configuration parameters affect the logical rep
    worker, but previously only wal_receiver_status_interval was not mentioned
    as such parameter in the doc.
    
    Back-patch to v10 where logical rep was added.
    
    Author: Masahiko Sawada
    Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBUnuH_UsnKXyPCsCR7EAMamW0sSb6a7=WgiQRpnMAp5w@mail.gmail.com

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for C4141 warning on MSVC
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for C4141 warning on MSVC