Re: Super Optimizing Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Super Optimizing Postgres
Date
Msg-id 20174.1005974074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Super Optimizing Postgres  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes:
> I think it's an interesting thought of having a program which will test
> a system and work out the Accurate and Correct values for this.

I think if you start out with the notion that there is an Accurate
and Correct value for these parameters, you've already lost the game.
They're inherently fuzzy numbers because they are parameters of an
(over?) simplified model of reality.

It would be interesting to try to fit the model to reality on a wide
variety of queries, machines & operating environments, and see what
numbers we come up with.  But there's always going to be a huge fuzz
factor involved.  Because of that, I'd be *real* wary of any automated
tuning procedure.  Without a good dollop of human judgement in the loop,
an automated parameter-setter will likely go off into never-never land
:-(
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Next
From: Masaru Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Re: regress test db