Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Arthur Zakirov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date
Msg-id 20171116114016.GA21162@zakirov.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:02:59PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> On the second thought, no, looks like I'm wrong and it should be like this.
> The
> reason is that any `fetch` function should be in form
> 
>     (container, internal) -> extracted value
> 
> which means that we need to return an extracted value (for jsonb it's a
> `jsonb`,
> for array it's an `anyelement`). But at the same time in general case we can
> figure out if the result is null only inside a `fetch` function,
> (`jsonb_get_element` for jsonb or whatever it may be for a custom data type)
> because it returns Datum. So the only way to return this information is by
> reference through the `internal` argument. To summarize, If as you said it's
> not that critical, I would suggest to leave it as it is.

Actually it is not only way to return isnull information. You can also return it using pointer to a boolean argument.
*fetch() functions also doesn't need in ExprEvalStep struct, you can pass SubscriptingRefState struct instead.

I mean the following code:

ExecEvalSubscriptingRefFetch(ExprState *state, ExprEvalStep *op)
{   ...   *op->resvalue = FunctionCall2(op->d.sbsref.eval_finfo,
PointerGetDatum(*op->resvalue),                                PointerGetDatum(op->d.sbsref.state),
           PointerGetDatum(op->resnull));
 
}

Datum
jsonb_subscript_fetch(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{   Datum containerSource = PG_GETARG_DATUM(0);   SubscriptingRefState *state = (SubscriptingRefState *)
PG_GETARG_POINTER(1);  bool *isNull = (bool *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(2);
 
   return jsonb_get_element(DatumGetJsonbP(containerSource),                            state->upper,
        state->numupper,                            isNull,                            false);
 
}

> To summarize, If as you said it's
> not that critical, I would suggest to leave it as it is.

Yes, I just wanted to share an opinion how to improve the code. I thought that the current approach may confuse
programmers,who will implement subscribting.
 

Also you can see extractValue() function of GIN [1]. It returns if values is null in same way.

1 - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/gin-extensibility.html

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Typo in comment