Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date
Msg-id 20170904152057.GC17009@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> 
> > >> There are currently two failing SSL tests which at least to me seems more
> > >> like they test specific OpenSSL behaviors rather than something which need
> > >> to be true for all SSL libraries.
> > 
> > > I don't know what we should do about these issues.
> > 
> > Maybe the SSL test suite needs to be implementation-specific as well.
> 
> If only two tests fail currently, I suggest that the thing to do is to
> split it up in generic vs. library-specific test files.  It should be
> easy to do with the TAP framework -- just move the library-specific
> tests to their own file and mark it as skipped at the start of the file
> when a different library is detected.

This seems like a much smarter and more reliable way to test.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept