Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date
Msg-id 20170901203337.usyfpro7kbxwjeco@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:

> >> There are currently two failing SSL tests which at least to me seems more
> >> like they test specific OpenSSL behaviors rather than something which need
> >> to be true for all SSL libraries.
> 
> > I don't know what we should do about these issues.
> 
> Maybe the SSL test suite needs to be implementation-specific as well.

If only two tests fail currently, I suggest that the thing to do is to
split it up in generic vs. library-specific test files.  It should be
easy to do with the TAP framework -- just move the library-specific
tests to their own file and mark it as skipped at the start of the file
when a different library is detected.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup throttling doesn't throttle as promised
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tupconvert.c API change in v10 release notes