Andres,
* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2017-08-14 23:28:21 +0000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 19:21 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > > > On 2017-08-14 19:09:23 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > >> I am unfortunately away for about a week. Perhaps Stephen Frost can
> > > help with any emergency patches to the server
> > >
> > > > Stephen? Any chance to relax the restriction here? It'd be somewhat bad
> > > > if we didn't have pg 10 buildfarm coverage over the next few days...
> > >
> > > In addition to just allowing submissions for v10, it'd be great if
> > > we could get the list of active branches for run_branches.pl updated,
> > > so that the critters with non-manually-maintained branch lists start
> > > doing the right thing.
> > >
> > > (Maybe that's the exact same thing, in which case nevermind.)
> >
> >
> > I can certainly patch servers if needed. I'll be back to a keyboard in
> > about 10m, tho I am at a loss as to what exactly needs doing here..?
> >
> > I'll try to find the rest of the thread when I reach a real computer.
>
> Based on a quick look it seems the error is triggered by
> https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/server-code/blob/master/cgi-bin/pgstatus.pl
>
> There appear to be two levels of checks here. First:
Thanks much. Yes, makes sense that branches_of_interest would need
updating. I can do that here shortly (Andrew- I recall updating this
previously in an incorrect way, any suggestions or tips about the
correct approach...?).
> Secondly there's:
> unless ($branch =~ /^(HEAD|REL\d+_\d+_STABLE)$/)
> {
> print
> "Status: 492 bad branch parameter $branch\nContent-Type: text/plain\n\n",
> "bad branch parameter $branch\n";
> exit;
> }
>
> which needs its regex adjusted... Based on a quick look preliminarily it
> seems to be ok to just make the first \d+ optional (i.e. (\d+)?).
Ah, yeah, that also makes sense. Andrew, I can certainly update that
in-place on the server, but I'm not sure if I can update the canonical
git repo. Just to verify- you'll do the same update in the git repo
before pushing your next code update...?
Thanks!
Stephen
