[pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-debian

From Christoph Berg
Subject [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x
Date
Msg-id 20170531150940.2nqkexxm6sfz25ko@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x
List pgsql-pkg-debian
Re: Tom Lane 2017-05-31 <28752.1496238931@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> OK, this looks good to me.  Just to make sure everyone's on the
> same page, what I propose to do is simplify all our platform-specific
> Makefiles that use either -fpic or -fPIC to use -fPIC unconditionally.
> This affects the netbsd, linux, and openbsd ports.  Looks like we should
> also change the example link commands in dfunc.sgml.

Ack.

> Next question: should we back-patch this change, or just do it in HEAD?

Debian "needs" it for 9.6, but I've already pushed the s390x patch in
the original posting, so I could just live with it being just in head.
But of course it would be nice to have everything in sync.

Christoph


pgsql-pkg-debian by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x