[HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id 20170531064429.GA1483913@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 01:34:33AM +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-06-01 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE
Next
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Range Merge Join v1