On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 03:20:41AM +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Annotate the fact that somebody added location fields to PartitionBoundSpec
> and PartitionRangeDatum but forgot to handle them in
> outfuncs.c/readfuncs.c. This is fairly harmless for production purposes
> (since readfuncs.c would just substitute -1 anyway) but it's still bogus.
> It's not worth forcing a post-beta1 initdb just to fix this, but if we
> have another reason to force initdb before 10.0, we should go back and
> clean this up.
+1 for immediately forcing initdb for this, getting it out of the way. We're
already unlikely to reach 10.0 without bumping catversion, but if we otherwise
did, releasing 10.0 with a 10beta1 catversion would have negative value.
