Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > If we invent more types in the future, would we expect those to be
> > defaulted to as well?
>
> I might be wrong, but my impression is that the plan is to default
> to gathering all possible stats types. So I'd probably write the
> addendum that way rather than naming those two types specifically.
Yes -- that plan has been hardcoded in ruleutils.c.
I'll patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
