On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:22:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We've had reasonably decent luck with tracking the tzcode/tzdata packages
> as local copies, so I feel like we're not taking on anything unreasonable
> if our model is that we'll occasionally (not oftener than once per year)
> update our copy to recent upstream and then re-indent using that.
I guess by having a copy in our tree we would overtly update our
version, rather than downloading whatever happens to be the most recent
version and finding changes by accident.
If we could download a specific version that had everything we need,
that would work too.
> > What about perltidy itself..? We don't include that in our tree either.
>
> Not being much of a Perl guy, I don't care one way or the other about
> perltidy. Somebody else can work on that if it needs work.
We have agreed on a fixed version of perltidy and I added a download
link to pgindent/README.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
