Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issuesfor foreign tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ildus Kurbangaliev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issuesfor foreign tables
Date
Msg-id 20170516172600.291220dc@wp.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 16 May 2017 21:36:11 +0900
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> On 2017/05/16 21:11, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
> > <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:  
> 
> >> I agree. Maybe this issue should be added to Postgresql Open Items?
> >> I think there should be some complex solution that fixes not only
> >> triggers for foreign tables at table partitioning, but covers other
> >> possible not working cases.  
> 
> > I doubt if this is an open item, since DMLs on foreign tables are
> > supported since 9.3 and support to add foreign tables to inheritance
> > was added back in 9.5.  
> 
> I think this issue was introduced by the latter, so that was my fault.
> 
> One approach I came up with to fix this issue is to rewrite the 
> targetList entries of an inherited UPDATE/DELETE properly using 
> rewriteTargetListUD, when generating a plan for each child table in 
> inheritance_planner.  Attached is a WIP patch for that.  Maybe I am 
> missing something, though.
> 
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita

I tested the patch, looks good.

-- 
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions