Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Date
Msg-id 20170515035036.GD1338212@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/8/17 02:58, Noah Misch wrote:
> > IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
> > for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
> > item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
> > 2017-05-09 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
> > ownership without further notice.
> 
> I got side-tracked by the minor releases preparation.  I will work on
> this now and report on Wednesday.

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-05-16 04:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description on connect_timeout whenmultiple hosts are specified
Next
From: Neha Khatri
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] If subscription to foreign table valid ?