Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Date
Msg-id 20170426112554.GH14000@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 07:33:27AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Masahiko Sawada
> > The idea of changing the default value seems good to me but I'm not sure
> > it's good idea to change the default value now under the circumstances where
> > we're focus on stabilization.
> > Also we should update the document as well.
> > 
> 
> We can consider like this: the OP found a usability problem as a result of PG 10 development, so we will fix it as a
stabilizationwork.
 

We did work in Postgres 10 to make replication simpler with better
defaults.  This would be part of that improvement.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?