Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6EC883@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
List pgsql-hackers
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Masahiko Sawada
> The idea of changing the default value seems good to me but I'm not sure
> it's good idea to change the default value now under the circumstances where
> we're focus on stabilization.
> Also we should update the document as well.
> 

We can consider like this: the OP found a usability problem as a result of PG 10 development, so we will fix it as a
stabilizationwork.
 

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization