Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name
Date
Msg-id 20170417213816.k26w7nrg2nlqrsik@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > >> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, 
> > >> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better.
> > 
> > > "stx" perhaps?
> > 
> > > I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta".
> > 
> > "stx" sounds pretty good to me --- it seems like e.g. "stxkind" is
> > more visibly distinct from "stakind" than "stekind" would be.
> > 
> > Any objections out there?
> 
> stx sounds good to me too.  I'll see about a patch this afternoon.

Took me a bit longer than I had hoped, but it's done now.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Allowing extended stats on foreign and partitioned tables
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Allowing extended stats on foreign and partitioned tables