Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > d) Replace most of the problematic code with psprintf() and dynamically
> > sized buffers.
>
> +1 for (c) as you have it. Later we might think about selectively
> doing (d), but it seems like more work for probably not much benefit.
Yeah -- also it's possible some of these code paths must not attempt to
palloc() for robustness reasons. I would go for c) only for now, and
only try d) for very specific cases where there are no such concerns.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
